Is Israel’s intellectual property policy worth it?
The answer depends on your perspective.
article Posted October 01, 2018 07:21:59 The Israeli government has recently been working to reform its intellectual property laws, but it is hard to see any silver lining in the new reform.
Israel is currently facing a legal challenge from an Israeli technology company, who has argued that the government should take the reins of the country’s legal system, rather than using the courts to resolve disputes.
This is the latest in a long line of legal challenges against the government’s intellectual estate policies.
The country’s Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has been grappling with this issue for years.
Over the past few years, the Israeli government adopted a series of legal reforms aimed at encouraging innovation, but these changes were mostly met with fierce criticism from industry groups.
In a 2015 study, the OECD’s Intellectual Ventures Unit (IVU) found that Israeli policymakers have failed to provide sufficient incentives for innovation.
“Many countries around the world, including Australia, Germany, and Switzerland, have laws requiring intellectual property to be licensed and regulated through an IPO.
In Israel, however, this is not the case.
Instead, the law requires that the state regulate the process of obtaining the trademark, and this is in turn limited to the public domain,” the report found.
While the IPO has attempted to tackle the problem, its current policies make it difficult to measure success.
Instead of being proactive, the government has focused on limiting the scope of trademark applications to those that are currently registered in the public sector, while allowing for more limited applications.
At the same time, Israel’s IPO is not only focused on the use of its trademark, but has a wide array of other legal remedies available to it, including patent infringement and copyright infringement lawsuits.
Critics of the IPOs have argued that these remedies are too weak and can’t be used to effectively defend against any infringement.
As a result, the country is not known for its rigorous patent system, which has made it hard to establish effective remedies for infringement.
In recent years, Israel has taken a more proactive approach in addressing the problem.
Since 2015, Israel passed the law that allows foreign companies to set up an office in Israel, in order to file trademark applications.
This office, known as an IPO, is responsible for reviewing all trademark applications submitted to the Israel Patent and Trademark Office.
The company must then submit an application for a trademark, which is then submitted to a patent examiner in the country.
For many foreign companies, the IPPOs process is cumbersome and time consuming, with the company having to file more than two applications for each trademark it wants to register.
However, Israeli companies have found that the process can be streamlined by hiring a lawyer to handle the process.
Despite the hurdles faced by foreign companies seeking to set-up an office here, it appears that the foreign companies have made a significant dent in Israel’s trademark system.
Now that foreign companies are able to register their trademarks in Israel without having to wait for an IPPO, it will be interesting to see how the country reacts.
Read more: Israel’s Intellectual property laws: How Israel is trying to reform them